Corrections

Last updated: July 1, 2026 · Maintained by the Miss Pepper AI editorial team.

We write about a field that changes fast, and we’re an AI-assisted publisher — so accuracy takes real discipline, and sometimes we’ll still get something wrong. When we do, we’d rather fix it in the open than quietly paper over it. This page explains what we correct, how to report a problem, and what happens after you do.

Why we have this policy

AI platforms change their behavior constantly, sources get updated, and writers are human. A standing corrections process is how a publisher stays trustworthy after hitting publish — it’s the difference between “we said it once and moved on” and “we stand behind every live page.” If something on this site is wrong, outdated, or misleading, we want to correct the record.

What we’ll correct

Factual errors — an incorrect statement about how an AI platform works, a wrong name, date, figure, or attribution.
Outdated information — a platform, tool, or best practice changed and our page hasn’t caught up. This happens often in AI search, and we treat it seriously.
Misleading framing — wording that’s technically defensible but likely to leave a reader with the wrong impression.
Broken or wrong links — including a source link pointing to the wrong place.
Unsupported claims — a statement we can’t back to a primary source or our own documented experience.

Differences of opinion or approach — for example, how much weight we give a particular tactic — aren’t “errors,” but we still want the feedback. It’s how our thinking, and our content, gets better over time.

How to report an error

Send us:

The page URL (and the section or sentence, if you can).
What’s wrong, in your own words.
A source, if you have one — a link to official documentation or a primary authority makes verification much faster.

Reach the editorial team through our contact page or by email at [email protected]. If you’re flagging something about your own company or product that we’ve described inaccurately, say so and point us to a source we can check.

What happens after you report

Acknowledge. We aim to confirm we received your report within a few business days.
Verify. We check the claim against primary sources — official platform documentation, announcements, or other named authorities. We don’t take anyone’s word for it without a source.
Correct. If it’s wrong, we fix it promptly and update the page’s visible “last updated” date.
Disclose when it matters. For a material correction — one that could have changed how a reader understood the topic — we add a dated correction note on the page itself, so the record is transparent rather than silently edited. Minor fixes (a typo, a dead link) are updated without a note.
Close the loop. If you gave us a way to reach you, we’ll tell you what we changed, or why we didn’t.

How we mark a material correction

A material correction appears as a short dated line on the affected page, for example:

Correction (date): An earlier version of this page stated [X]. That was inaccurate; the page has been updated to reflect [Y].

We don’t rewrite history quietly. If something was wrong in a way that mattered, the correction stays visible. This policy is part of our Editorial Standards, and it works hand in hand with our AI Content Disclosure — because using AI to help draft content makes a real correction process more important, not less.